Live video streaming: Microsoft or Adobe?

I am looking for a Live Video Streaming solution.

The clients will be able to watch the video with a plugin (Flash or Silverlight), or a standalone application (Windows Media Player, FLV, etc).

But I can’t choose between Microsoft Solution (Windows Media Server (MMS, RTSP) + Silverlight as client) or the Adobe solution (Flash Media Server (RTMP) + Flash/Flex).

The streaming is for short duration cast and will not be online 24/24h.

I tried both, and I found the cheaper version of FMS don’t provide security to prevent users to register as published (you have to write custom module…), Windows Media Server provides this function.

We already have Windows Server licences. (So Windows Media Server will be “free” for us.)

What do you recommend? What is the best between Flash or Silverlight for Live Video Streaming?

Thank you!

Answer

We went with FMS because of its built in fuctionality with flash clients, and was still pretty cheap (in context) to license. It also came with some demo apps that almost perfectly suited our needs. In fact if it’s <= 5 users then the demo license will be fine.

That said, we didn’t look into the Windows Media Server much because we didn’t have any developers with experience in it, so I can’t provide a fair comparison.

One thing we really liked was the ability in FMS to publish at multiple bit levels, because we were streaming to churches in remote
locations they could only handle say 256kbps, whereas those in the city or at home could handle 1500kbps, and FMS let the user switch on the fly without a dropout in stream. It would even automatically switch down a bitrate if the local connection couldn’t keep up.

Attribution
Source : Link , Question Author : Kedare , Answer Author : Mark Henderson

Leave a Comment